Vollmer v. Selden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing be‐ tween intervenors who raise value of settlement and those who “cause expensive delay in the hope of getting paid to go away”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Trans Union Corp. Privacy Litigation
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-01-14· cited 37×
• Clark v. Gannett Co., Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2019-05-17· cited 7×
• Gregory Markow v. Southwest Airlines Company
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-08-02

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
• Claire Rand, Custodian for Brett Rand v. Monsanto Company
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-02-20· cited 180×
• In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
  D. New Jersey· 1997-03-17· cited 180×
• Jerry L. Crabill v. Trans Union, L.L.C.
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-07-30· cited 136×
• Gottlieb v. Westin Hotel Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-04-02· cited 93×
• Melvin D. Reed v. The Great Lakes Companies, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-06-24· cited 89×
• Kotsilieris v. Chalmers
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-07-10· cited 77×
• Matthew Burda v. M. Ecker Company
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-08-25· cited 62×
• Vollmer v. Publishers Clearing House and Campus Subscriptions
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-04-27· cited 56×
• Jack Rothenberg and Shirley Rothenberg v. Security Management Company, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-07-19· cited 44×
• Crawford v. Equifax Payment Services, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-01-03· cited 34×
• White v. General Motors Corp.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-06-29· cited 13×
• In the Matter Of: David M. Bagdade
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-02-12· cited 11×
• In Re Synthroid Marketing Litigation
  N.D. Illinois· 2002-05-09· cited 7×
• French v. Selden
  D. Kansas· 1999-07-16· cited 5×
• Vollmer, Thomas v. Selden, Lynde
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-11-26· cited 1×