Skip to main content
· 8/31/2001

In the Matter Of: Synthroid Marketing Litigation

Citations

  • 264 F.3d 712
  • 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 736
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that in some circumstances a sliding scale arrangement will not be ideal
  • noting that market rate depends “in part on the amount of work necessary to resolve the litigation”
  • reasoning that “[p]rivate parties would never contract for such an arrangement, because it would eliminate counsel’s incentive to press for” a higher settlement
  • explaining that “only ex ante can the costs and benefits of par- ticular systems and risk multipliers be assessed intelli- gently”
  • holding that “[m]arkets would not tolerate [the megafund] effect”
  • stating that risk of nonpayment is factor to consider in setting fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.