In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that objectors “have voluntarily inserted themselves into this action, and as such, depositions . . . are relevant and proper”
• finding that objectors “have voluntarily inserted themselves into this action, and as such, depositions . . . are relevant and proper”
• holding objectors in contempt for refusing to be deposed
• holding objectors in contempt for refusing to be deposed
• discussing civil-contempt standard under Rule 37(b)
• discussing civil-contempt standard under Rule 37(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Sabrina Laguna v. Coverall North America, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-06-03· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-08-29· cited 2,102×
• Reno Air Racing Association, Inc. v. Jerry McCord
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-07-07· cited 451×
• Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-03-03· cited 204×
• United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc., Hca, Inc. And West Paces Medical Center
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-04-11· cited 48×
• General Insurance Company Of America v. Eastern Consolidated Utilities, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1997-09-22· cited 31×
• SEKAQUAPTEWA v. MacDONALD
  Ninth Circuit· 1976-09-27· cited 23×
• Wolfard Glassblowing Company v. Willy Vanbragt Mary Vanbragt, Individually, and Doing Business as Zodiac Expressions
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-07-07· cited 21×