Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, with respect to discovery abuses, “[prejudice from unreasonable delay is presumed’ ’ and failure to comply with court orders mandating discovery “is sufficient prejudice”
• recognizing that a warning can satisfy the “consideration of alternatives” requirement” (citations omitted)
• explaining that a court abuses its discretion if it first imposes default judgment as a sanction without fii’st considering whether less drastic sanctions are adequate
• recognizing that warnings can satisfy the “availability of less drastic sanctions” factor
• recognizing that warnings can satisfy the “availability of less drastic sanctions” factor
• recognizing that warnings can satisfy the “availability of less drastic sanctions” factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).