Skip to main content

In Re Taylor

Citations

  • 198 B.R. 142
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 854
  • 1996 WL 399876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that section 365 is either an exclusive remedy or a necessary intermediate step before a sale of assets under section 363 is available
  • holding the debtor had failed to meet the requirements of the sound business purpose test and, therefore, a pre-confirmation sale of the nursing home assets was premature
  • holding the debtor had failed to meet the requirements of the sound business purpose test and, therefore, a pre-confirmation sale of the nursing home assets was premature
  • finding that the bankruptcy court retained jurisdiction to rule on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment where the order on appeal did not adjudicate the issues of the validity and enforceability
  • “A pending appeal of a bankruptcy decision does not deprive the bankruptcy court of jurisdiction over issues not involved in the appeal.”
  • summarizing legislative history and case law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John E. Waites

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.