In Re Haskell L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that lessee-tenant’s losses if displaced from leased premises were incapable of calculation based on the record, and adequate protection under the circumstances could only be achieved by lessee-tenant’s continued occupation of leased premises
• paragraph (5) does not encompass eminent domain proceedings because the trustee must be the party capable of compelling the interest holder to accept a money satisfaction
• “ ‘the only logical interpretation of ... § 363(f)(5) is that the statute requires that the trustee or debtor be the party able to compel monetary satisfaction for the interest which is the subject of the sale.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).