South Motor Co. v. Carter-Pritchett-Hodges, Inc. (In Re MMH Automotive Group, LLC)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the majority interpretation because it would “lead to an absurd result — elevating tenants of rejected leases, without exception, to a protected status they might not enjoy in the absence of rejection, and ... at the expense of other creditors of the estate”
• fashioning a remedy short of rescinding the entire sale
• rejecting de facto rejection rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).