In re Sunedison, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 2004 gives the Court ‘significant’ discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1991-01-17· cited 44×
• In Re Enron Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2002-08-15· cited 40×
• In Re Bennett Funding Group, Inc.
  N.D. New York· 1996-10-11· cited 34×
• ePlus, Inc. v. Katz (In Re Metiom, Inc.)
  S.D. New York· 2004-12-15· cited 32×
• In Re Dinubilo
  E.D. California· 1993-05-10· cited 32×
• In Re the Board of Directors of Hopewell International Insurance
  S.D. New York· 2001-02-09· cited 26×
• In Re Washington Mutual, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2009-06-24· cited 18×
• In Re Coffee Cupboard, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1991-07-10· cited 16×
• Snyder v. Society Bank
  S.D. Texas· 1994-07-18· cited 15×
• In re AOG Entertainment, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2016-09-16· cited 11×
• In Matter of James R. Snyder
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-04-12· cited 10×
• In Re Corso
  E.D. New York· 2005-08-08· cited 9×
• In re Petroforte Brasileiro de Petroleo Ltda.
  S.D. Florida· 2015-12-22· cited 6×
• In re Sunedison, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2017-01-18· cited 3×