In Re Enron Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “well recognized rule” that once proceeding commenced, discovery should be pursued under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and not Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004
• discussing the “well recognized rule that once an adversary proceeding or contested matter is commenced, discovery should be pursued under the Federal Rules of Civil procedure and not by Rule 2004”
• bankruptcy court deciding in the 3 15 first instance whether the PSLRA stay applies to limit discovery in bankruptcy proceedings
• \ Rule 2004 examinations are appropriate for revealing the nature and extent of the bankruptcy estate.\
• “As the permissive language of the rule suggests, the Court has the discretion to grant a request for a 2004 examination.”
• “Rule 2004 examinations are appropriate for revealing the nature and extent of the bankruptcy estate and for discovering assets, examining transactions, and determining whether wrongdoing has occurred.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).