S.D. New York· 1/18/2017
In re Sunedison, Inc.
Citations
- 562 B.R. 243
- 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 150
- 63 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 163
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he spirit of proportionality is consistent with the historic concerns regarding the burden on the producing party and is relevant to the determination of cause.”
- “The spirit of proportionality is consistent with the historic concerns regarding the burden on the producing party and is relevant to the determination of cause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bernstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Garland Corp.Massachusetts· 1980-10-17· cited 52×
- In Re the Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.S.D. New York· 1991-01-17· cited 44×
- ePlus, Inc. v. Katz (In Re Metiom, Inc.)S.D. New York· 2004-12-15· cited 32×
- In Re DinubiloE.D. California· 1993-05-10· cited 32×
- In re FoerstS.D. New York· 1899-04-15· cited 28×
- In Re the Board of Directors of Hopewell International InsuranceS.D. New York· 2001-02-09· cited 26×
- In Re FearnS.D. Ohio· 1989-02-01· cited 21×
- In Re Coffee Cupboard, Inc.E.D. New York· 1991-07-10· cited 16×
- In re AOG Entertainment, Inc.S.D. New York· 2016-09-16· cited 11×
- In re SunEdison, Inc.S.D. New York· 2016-08-12· cited 6×
- In Re RF Cunningham & Co., Inc.E.D. New York· 2006-11-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.