In Re Fearn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to quash rule 2004 discovery while noting need for documents sought
• denying a motion to quash a 2004 examination and noting that “the primary purpose of a Rule 2004 examination is to permit a party in interest to quickly ascertain the extent and location of the estate’s assets ... ”
• denying a motion to quash a 2004 examination and noting that “the primary purpose of a Rule 2004 examination is to permit a party in interest to quickly ascertain the extent and location of the estate’s assets . . . ”
• scope of Rule 2004 examination should not be so broad as to be more disruptive and costly to the party to be examined than beneficial to the party seeking discovery
• scope of Rule 2004 examination should not be so broad as to be more disruptive and costly to the party to be examined than beneficial to the party seeking discovery
• “While the scope of a Rule 2004 examination is very broad, it is not limitless. The examination should not be so broad as to be more disruptive and costly to the party sought to be examined than beneficial to the party seeking discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).