S.D. New York· 10/7/1999
In re Sumitomo Copper Litigation
Citations
- 189 F.R.D. 274
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15594
- 1999 WL 813432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that having reached a settlement after discovery, investigation, and analyses weighed strongly toward approval of the settlement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pollack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Global Crossing Securities & Erisa LitigationS.D. New York· 2004-11-24· cited 131×
- In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2001-03-08· cited 52×
- Sumitomo Copper Litigation v. Credit Lyonnais Rouse, Ltd.Second Circuit· 2001-08-15· cited 46×
- In re Marsh Erisa LitigationS.D. New York· 2010-01-29· cited 40×
- Thompson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceS.D. New York· 2003-04-29· cited 25×
- In re Merrill Lynch Tyco Research Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2008-04-16· cited 25×
- In re Giant Interactive Group, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2011-11-02· cited 21×
- In Re Sumitomo Copper Litigation ClassSecond Circuit· 2001-08-15· cited 20×
- Strougo ex rel. Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. v. BassiniS.D. New York· 2003-04-07· cited 16×
- In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Research Reports Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2007-09-05· cited 15×
- In re Imax Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2012-06-20· cited 15×
- New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund v. Fruit of the Loom, Inc.W.D. Kentucky· 2006-03-17· cited 13×
- Meredith Corp. v. SESAC, LLCS.D. New York· 2015-02-19· cited 7×
- In re Citigroup Inc. Bond LitigationS.D. New York· 2013-08-20· cited 7×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 2,939×
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court· 1975-01-14· cited 2,006×
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationSecond Circuit· 1974-03-13· cited 1,333×
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanySeventh Circuit· 1983-10-01· cited 490×
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossSecond Circuit· 1979-06-25· cited 457×
- Cotton v. HintonFifth Circuit· 1977-09-30· cited 455×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. CoyneSecond Circuit· 1983-01-26· cited 443×
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 412×
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidaySecond Circuit· 1971-09-01· cited 291×
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.First Circuit· 1992-03-27· cited 245×
- Veteto v. WardenSupreme Court· 1983-10-11· cited 230×
- Korn v. Franchard Corp.Second Circuit· 1972-03-06· cited 170×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,389 Irving A. Backman v. Polaroid Corporation, Irving A. Backman v. Polaroid CorporationFirst Circuit· 1990-08-02· cited 159×
- State of West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.S.D. New York· 1970-09-18· cited 158×
- In Re Bendectin Products Liability LitigationSixth Circuit· 1984-12-14· cited 156×
- In Re Warner Communications Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1985-08-20· cited 143×
- In re LTV Securities LitigationN.D. Texas· 1980-07-31· cited 113×
- Plummer v. Chemical BankSecond Circuit· 1982-01-05· cited 111×
- In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnerships LitigationS.D. New York· 1997-03-20· cited 106×
- Doherty v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation BoardSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 104×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.