District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 11/2/2000
In Re Steinberg
Citations
- 761 A.2d 279
- 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 259
- 2000 WL 1673180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the Court noted a distinction between lawyers who never respond and lawyers who ultimately respond and participate in the disciplinary process; the Court also noted that prior discipline can increase sanction
- no fitness requirement where response to complaint was filed the day before hearing
- appending Board report and recommendation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb, Washington, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-06· cited 51×
- In re HowesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-03-08· cited 26×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-18· cited 20×
- In Re GodetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-04-05· cited 18×
- In Re SpikesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-09-01· cited 18×
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-09-08· cited 17×
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-12-30· cited 6×
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-07-07· cited 4×
- In Re MabryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-06-03· cited 4×
- In Re AbrahamsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-06-24· cited 4×
- In re CharlesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-08-05· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-07-17· cited 170×
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-12-31· cited 140×
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-19· cited 58×
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-18· cited 29×
- In Re LockieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-10-24· cited 22×
- In Re ReedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-11· cited 18×
- In Re ChangDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-05-22· cited 17×
- In Re WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-11-13· cited 14×
- In Re LillyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-18· cited 13×
- Matter of HillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-01-26· cited 13×
- In Re SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-10-31· cited 12×
- In Re KarrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-10-15· cited 9×
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-11-30· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.