District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/31/1994
In Re Smith
Citations
- 649 A.2d 299
- 1994 D.C. App. LEXIS 198
- 1994 WL 594789
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- 30-day suspension with fitness showing due to respondent’s “persistent disregard for the disciplinary process”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb, King, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-07-17· cited 170×
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-08-28· cited 58×
- In Re LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-06· cited 25×
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-09-08· cited 17×
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-11-02· cited 15×
- In Re WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-11-13· cited 14×
- In Re LillyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-18· cited 13×
- In Re RoxboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-05-06· cited 10×
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-12-30· cited 6×
- In re Carr-KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-08-14· cited 1×
- In re SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-03-02
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.