D. Kansas· 6/27/2006
In Re Spencer
Citations
- 362 B.R. 489
- 56 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 520
- 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1305
- 2006 WL 4063031
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘[T]he funds remained in the debtors’ possession and control at the date of the petition, were property of the estate, and were therefore subject to turnover.’
- ‘[T]he funds remained in the debtors’ possession and control at the date of the petition, were property of the estate, and were therefore subject to turnover.’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert E. Nugent
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jubber v. Ruiz (In Re Ruiz)Tenth Circuit· 2011-08-17· cited 17×
- Yoon v. Minter-HigginsN.D. Indiana· 2008-02-08· cited 9×
- In re PurcellD. Kansas· 2017-07-19· cited 7×
- In Re BrubakerM.D. Florida· 2010-04-01· cited 5×
- In re PilateDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-06· cited 4×
- Lee v. Walro (In re Walro)S.D. Indiana· 2014-03-31· cited 3×
- Turner Grain Merchandising, Inc. v. Helena National Bank (In re Turner Grain Merchandising, Inc.)E.D. Arkansas· 2016-02-02· cited 2×
- In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2024-03-25
- In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2024-04-01
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 3,653×
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court· 1992-04-21· cited 949×
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 682×
- Wittman v. State Farm Life Insurance (In Re Mills)D. Kansas· 1994-11-15· cited 25×
- In Re FigueiraD. Kansas· 1993-12-30· cited 22×
- In Re DybalskiS.D. Indiana· 2004-09-28· cited 16×
- In Re SawyerD. Arizona· 2005-03-30· cited 14×
- Keller v. Blinder (In Re Blinder, Robinson & Co.)D. Colorado· 1992-05-01· cited 13×
- Hill v. Muniz (In Re Muniz)D. Colorado· 2005-01-19· cited 13×
- In Re TaylorW.D. Missouri· 2005-11-09· cited 13×
- Mather v. Tailored Fabrics, Inc. (In Re Himes)E.D. Oklahoma· 1995-03-17· cited 12×
- Maurer v. Hedback (In Re Maurer)D. Minnesota· 1992-05-27· cited 11×
- Redmond v. Lentz & Clark, P.A. (In Re Wagers)D. Kansas· 2006-02-23· cited 5×
- In Re ReslerD. Kansas· 2002-08-19· cited 5×
- In Re DanowskiN.D. Ohio· 2005-01-31· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.