In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls Llc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the speaker seeks access to diorama display cases in an airport, the public forum inquiry focuses on the display cases rather than the airport as a whole
• holding that the First Amendment applied to corporation’s decisions not to display certain advertising material where city’s contract gave it discretion to control the contents of advertisements in airport
• holding that display diorama in airport, not entire concourse, constituted relevant forum
• holding the defendant’s intent was an inherently factual issue “that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss.”
• finding no “indication that permitting public interest groups to advertise would threaten the vitality of the City’s commercial interests in deriving revenue from the advertising displays.”
• finding no \indication that permitting public interest groups to advertise would threaten the vitality of the City's commercial interests in deriving revenue from the advertising displays.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).