· 10/1/2009
In Re Spansion, Inc.
Citations
- 418 B.R. 84
- 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3077
- 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 59
- 2009 WL 3170304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the automatic stay applies ... because the claims asserted ... ‘could have been brought’ and were, in fact, brought, prepetition”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kevin J. Carey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.