Irwin Halper v. Barry Halper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where Court is confronted with disparate causes of actions in determining whether core matters raised, analysis must proceed on a claim-by-claim basis
• explaining that where Court is confronted with disparate causes of actions in determining whether core matters raised, analysis must proceed on a claim-by-claim basis
• noting that, with a mixture of core and non-core claims, the claims should each be separately analyzed to determine if they are core or non-core
• noting that, with a mixture of core and non-core claims, the claims should each be separately analyzed to determine if they are core or non-core
• proceeding is “core” “if it is a proceeding that, by its nature, could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case”
• noting that “[c]er-tainty or likelihood is not a requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).