Skip to main content
· 4/10/1992

Izzarelli v. Rexene Products Co. (In Re Rexene Products Co.)

Citations

  • 141 B.R. 574
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether there is cause to lift the automatic stay must be determined on a case-by-case basis
  • “Where neither prejudice to the bankruptcy estate nor interference with the bankruptcy proceeding is demonstrated, the desire of a stayed party to proceed in another forum is sufficient cause to warrant lifting the automatic stay.”
  • “This theme is echoed in the equitable balancing test most courts apply to determine if cause exists to lift the stay [under section 362(d)(1)] to allow pending litigation to proceed or continue in another forum.”
  • discussing historical reasons for protection of setoff rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Balick, Helen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.