S.D. Texas· 11/14/2006
In Re Solis
Citations
- 356 B.R. 398
- 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3126
- 2006 WL 3298351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- setting forth some guidelines for determining personal use but stating that it would consider all facts and circumstances to determine whether a vehicle was acquired with the intent of providing personal benefits to the debtor
- “[S]ignificant and material” intended use of a vehicle by the debtor constitutes “personal use” despite nonfiling spouse’s primary use of the vehicle.
- “The Court will determine that the ‘personal use’ requirement of the statute is satisfied if the personal use of the debtor is significant and material, regardless of whether there is also some business use.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wesley W. Steen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re LookD. Maine· 2008-03-06· cited 19×
- In Re DeanEleventh Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 17×
- In Re PhillipsE.D. Virginia· 2007-03-08· cited 12×
- In Re BethoneyD. Massachusetts· 2008-01-17· cited 9×
- In Re LorenzE.D. Virginia· 2007-04-19· cited 7×
- In Re AdawayE.D. Texas· 2007-04-10· cited 6×
- In Re LaDeauxS.D. Ohio· 2007-07-26· cited 6×
- In Re MooreD. Kansas· 2007-04-13· cited 4×
- In Re CrossS.D. Ohio· 2007-09-27· cited 4×
- In Re MatthewsD. South Carolina· 2007-08-28· cited 4×
- Nuvell Financial Services Corp. v. DeanEleventh Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 3×
- In Re StrangeM.D. Georgia· 2010-01-20· cited 2×
- In Re MedinaS.D. Texas· 2007-03-12· cited 2×
- In Re OzenkoskiE.D. Missouri· 2009-10-23· cited 2×
- In Re AndohD. Colorado· 2007-06-08· cited 2×
- In re McGinnessE.D. Tennessee· 2018-03-02· cited 1×
- In re MaushartM.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-10-25
- In re RoyalS.D. California· 2018-04-12
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Till v. SCS Credit Corp.Supreme Court· 2004-05-17· cited 381×
- In Re DeSardiS.D. Texas· 2006-04-21· cited 66×
- In Re Lorraine B. Runski, Debtor. Cypher Chiropractic Center, Creditor-Appellant v. Lorraine B. Runski, Debtor-AppelleeFourth Circuit· 1996-12-18· cited 51×
- In Re CarverS.D. Georgia· 2006-03-06· cited 46×
- In Re HornM.D. Alabama· 2006-02-23· cited 31×
- In Re WhiteE.D. Louisiana· 2006-09-29· cited 22×
- In Re JacksonM.D. Georgia· 2006-03-06· cited 16×
- In Re HillW.D. Louisiana· 2006-09-01· cited 14×
- In Re VagiN.D. Ohio· 2006-09-26· cited 7×
- Highland Federal Bank v. Maynard (In Re Maynard)Ninth Circuit· 2001-06-06· cited 6×
- In Re LewisD. Kansas· 2006-08-03· cited 4×
- Rodriguez v. Madera County Federal Credit Union (In Re Rodriguez)E.D. California· 1993-08-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.