In Re Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Vehicle acquired to “generat[e] income for th[e] maintenance and support” of the household did not fall within the hanging paragraph.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Solis
  S.D. Texas· 2006-11-14· cited 21×
• In Re Look
  D. Maine· 2008-03-06· cited 19×
• In Re Phillips
  E.D. Virginia· 2007-03-08· cited 12×
• In Re Bethoney
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-01-17· cited 9×
• In Re Lorenz
  E.D. Virginia· 2007-04-19· cited 7×
• In Re LaDeaux
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-07-26· cited 6×
• In Re Matthews
  D. South Carolina· 2007-08-28· cited 4×
• In Re Medina
  S.D. Texas· 2007-03-12· cited 2×
• In Re Ozenkoski
  E.D. Missouri· 2009-10-23· cited 2×
• In Re Andoh
  D. Colorado· 2007-06-08· cited 2×
• In re McGinness
  E.D. Tennessee· 2018-03-02· cited 1×
• In re Royal
  S.D. California· 2018-04-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• Public Finance Corporation v. Eddie and Angela Freeman
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-08-19· cited 83×
• Gamble v. Gamble (In Re Gamble)
  Fifth Circuit· 1998-06-22· cited 64×
• In Re Sosa
  W.D. Texas· 2005-12-22· cited 14×