In re Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if the post-confirmation appreciation in value was property of the estate, the appreciation is not disposable income [that could be made available to creditors in the analogous chapter 12 context.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re: Richard L. Black
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-12-31

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barbosa v. Solomon
  First Circuit· 2000-12-21· cited 129×
• Hall v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2012-05-14· cited 126×
• Hagel v. Drummond (In Re Hagel)
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-07-28· cited 80×
• McDonald v. Burgie (In Re Burgie)
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-31· cited 36×
• In Re Euler
  M.D. Florida· 2000-08-09· cited 24×
• In Re Kieta
  D. Massachusetts· 2004-09-22· cited 6×
• In Re Powers
  N.D. Texas· 2010-06-24· cited 5×