Barbosa v. Solomon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding modification of chapter 13 plan to require 100% payout to unsecured creditors following sale of investment property not an abuse of discretion
• explaining that this approach “gives meaning to both sections 1306 and 1327, without the subjective analysis required by the [estate transformation] approach”
• rejecting the ‘substantial and unanticipated change’ standard as ‘not contemplated by the statute’
• affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision to require an increased dividend to unsecured creditors
• “Because we think that this approach has a logical consistency that harmonizes two apparent inconsistent sections .... ”
• “These are doctrines of judicial origin.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).