In Re Baird

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding debt not liquidated if need extensive factual discovery on amount and liability
• “simply because there is no legal obligation to continue the payments hardly proves absence of income for § 101(30) purposes”
• also indicating that “this Court does not find the evidence contained in the [debtor’s] [schedules to be conclusive of a lack of sufficient income to fund the plan”
• a debt based on a breach of contract claim was contingent because the debtor was not a party to the contract even though the creditor alleged in state court that the debtor was liable for the breach of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re: James P. Slack, Debtor. James P. Slack v. Wilshire Insurance Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-07-30· cited 63×
• Pellegrino v. Boyajian (Pellegrino)
  First Circuit· 2010-02-09· cited 14×
• In re Wark
  D. Kansas· 2015-12-17· cited 13×
• In Re Perkins
  S.D. Illinois· 2007-11-21· cited 10×
• In Re Baird
  M.D. Florida· 1999-05-25· cited 9×
• In Re Smith
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-02-12· cited 5×
• In Re Mercado
  M.D. Florida· 2007-09-24· cited 4×
• In Re Goodrich
  M.D. Florida· 2000-12-13· cited 4×
• In re Robinson
  N.D. Georgia· 2015-07-22· cited 4×
• In Re Spurlin
  W.D. Louisiana· 2006-08-25· cited 3×