Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 1/26/2001

In re Sealed Case

Citations

  • 237 F.3d 657
  • 345 U.S. App. D.C. 19
  • 2001 WL 61080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that \choices made by FEC attorneys--without the Commission's ratification and acceptance--do not stand as the authoritative interpretation of the agency requiring deference\
  • holding that sealing issue is “completely separate from the underlying subpoena enforcement action.”
  • noting that the confidentiality provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act would “create an extraordinarily strong privacy interest in keeping ... records sealed” under Hubbard
  • reversing district court order denying motion to seal where Federal Election Campaign Act and implementing regulations prohibited Federal Election Commission from publicly disclosing certain information
  • Commission filed in open court the complaint, a staff analysis detailing the alleged violations, the Commission's \reason to believe\ finding, and information concerning an unrelated investigation
  • section 30109(a)(12)(A)\plainly prohibit[s] the FEC from disclosing information concerning ongoing investigations under any circumstances without the written consent of the subject of the investigation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Henderson, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.