· 3/3/2006
In Re. Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Commodity Futures Trading Commission WD Energy Services Inc.
Citations
- 439 F.3d 740
- 370 U.S. App. D.C. 113
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5391
- 2006 WL 508066
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a “right to raise collateral estoppel as a ground to quash or modify a subpoena”
- “[Civil] Rule 45(d)(2) is generally satisfied by the sub mission of a privilege log detailing each document withheld and the reason.”
- “[Civil] Rule 45(d)(2) is generally satisfied by the submission of a privilege log detailing each document withheld and the reason.”
- “A subpoena enforcement action is technically a different case.” (citation omitted and alteration in original accepted)
- a party bringing a motion to compel bears the initial burden of showing that the information is relevant and discoverable; then the burden shifts to the defendant to prove that the information is privileged
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Tatel, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.