Skip to main content
· 3/3/2006

In Re. Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Commodity Futures Trading Commission WD Energy Services Inc.

Citations

  • 439 F.3d 740
  • 370 U.S. App. D.C. 113
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5391
  • 2006 WL 508066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a “right to raise collateral estoppel as a ground to quash or modify a subpoena”
  • “[Civil] Rule 45(d)(2) is generally satisfied by the sub mission of a privilege log detailing each document withheld and the reason.”
  • “[Civil] Rule 45(d)(2) is generally satisfied by the submission of a privilege log detailing each document withheld and the reason.”
  • “A subpoena enforcement action is technically a different case.” (citation omitted and alteration in original accepted)
  • a party bringing a motion to compel bears the initial burden of showing that the information is relevant and discoverable; then the burden shifts to the defendant to prove that the information is privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Tatel, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.