D. North Dakota· 5/20/1994
In Re Schriock Construction, Inc.
Citations
- 167 B.R. 569
- 31 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 512
- 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 813
- 1994 WL 234527
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The concept of rehabilitation necessarily hinges upon establishing a cash flow from which current obligations can be satisfied.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William A. Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Taub v. Taub (In Re Taub)E.D. New York· 2010-04-09· cited 33×
- In Re Landmark Atlantic Hess Farm, LLCD. Maryland· 2011-03-03· cited 26×
- In Re v. CompaniesN.D. Ohio· 2002-03-08· cited 19×
- In Re Westgate Properties, Ltd.N.D. Ohio· 2010-06-25· cited 17×
- In Re American HomePatient, Inc.M.D. Tennessee· 2003-05-15· cited 16×
- In Re FallN.D. Ohio· 2008-01-08· cited 13×
- In re Costa Bonita Beach Resort, Inc.D. Puerto Rico· 2014-06-02· cited 13×
- In re GrassoE.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-07-11· cited 11×
- Loop Corp. v. United States TrusteeEighth Circuit· 2004-08-16· cited 10×
- In re PaternoM.D. North Carolina· 2014-05-30· cited 10×
- In Re Ashley Oaks Development Corp.D. South Carolina· 2011-03-29· cited 8×
- All Denominational New Church v. Pelofsky (In Re All Denominational New Church)Eighth Circuit· 2001-10-31· cited 7×
- In Re Om Shivai, Inc.D. South Carolina· 2011-04-01· cited 7×
- In Re 4 C Solutions, Inc.C.D. Illinois· 2003-01-16· cited 5×
- Diwan, L.L.C. v. Maha-Vishnu CorporationEighth Circuit· 2017-02-17· cited 3×
- In Re Cornwall Personal Insurance Agency, Inc.N.D. Texas· 2003-07-25· cited 2×
- Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Moultrie (In re Moultrie)N.D. Georgia· 2018-06-14· cited 2×
- In re Lichtin/Wade, L.L.C.E.D. North Carolina· 2012-08-28· cited 1×
- Robert Hatcher v. Allison FinancialEighth Circuit· 1998-03-06
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 5,972×
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court· 1934-04-30· cited 1,739×
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 992×
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court· 1939-12-04· cited 603×
- Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 500×
- In Re Bonner Mall Partnership, Debtor. Bonner Mall Partnership v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co.Ninth Circuit· 1993-08-04· cited 232×
- In the Matter of Greystone III Joint Venture, Debtor. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Greystone III Joint VentureFifth Circuit· 1992-02-27· cited 166×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1985-03-01· cited 164×
- Cutright v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-10-05· cited 130×
- Tennessee Publishing Co. v. American National BankSupreme Court· 1936-11-09· cited 116×
- In Re ClarksonEighth Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 42×
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court· 1994-01-10· cited 42×
- In Re Great American Pyramid Joint VentureW.D. Tennessee· 1992-08-19· cited 36×
- In Re Fursman RanchW.D. Missouri· 1984-04-06· cited 33×
- In Re W. Robert Anderson and Virginia A. Anderson. W. Robert Anderson and Virginia A. Anderson v. Farm Credit Bank of St. PaulEighth Circuit· 1990-09-06· cited 23×
- In Re M & S Associates, Ltd.W.D. Texas· 1992-04-17· cited 23×
- In Re Kurt Blankemeyer and Sharon K. Blankemeyer, Debtors. Appeal of Kurt Blankemeyer and Sharon K. BlankemeyerEighth Circuit· 1988-12-16· cited 18×
- In Re HenkeD. Montana· 1988-09-01· cited 18×
- Steelcase, Inc. v. Johnston (In Re Johnston)Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-01· cited 17×
Other cases named In Re Schriock Construction, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.