Skip to main content
· 8/4/1993

In Re Bonner Mall Partnership, Debtor. Bonner Mall Partnership v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co.

Citations

  • 2 F.3d 899
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5848
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 10042
  • 29 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 668
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19880
  • 24 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 883
  • 1993 WL 288507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ALJ’s failure to list plaintiff’s bursitis as a severe 3 impairment at step two was harmless where ALJ considered limitations caused by the condition at 4 step four
  • noting that “[cjausation for any event has many and varied levels” and asserting that Congress surely intended a more “direct or immediate causation”
  • noting that \[c]ausation for any event has many and varied levels\ and asserting that Congress surely intended a more \direct or immediate causation\
  • noting that in such cases old equity takes nothing “on account of’ its prior interest
  • accepting jurisdiction where, depending on outcome of appeal, remand could require bankruptcy court in Chapter 11 proceedings to make new-value determination
  • discussing the need for bankruptcy courts to \carefully apply\ the strictures of the new value exception in order to prevent old equity from circumventing the purpose of the absolute priority rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Canby, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.