In Re Sara K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that although the Department and the parent have a shared responsibility to make good faith efforts to reunify the family, “the Department is not charged with the duty of persisting in efforts that can only be destined for failure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 10941
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-07· cited 79×
• In Re Thomas D.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-08-04· cited 66×
• In re Jacob B.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2008-11-13· cited 24×
• In Re David G.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-06-09· cited 21×
• In Re David H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-03-01· cited 7×
• In re Child of Christine M.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2018-10-04· cited 5×
• In re Christine M.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2018-10-04· cited 5×
• In re Child of Amanda H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-03-12· cited 1×
• In re Amanda H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-03-12· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santosky v. Kramer
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
• People in Interest of P.B.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-07-17· cited 38×
• In Re Daniel C.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-08-03· cited 35×
• In Re Annette P.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-04-10· cited 26×
• In Re Misty Lee H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-08-06· cited 21×
• In Re Amber B.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-10-11· cited 13×