In Re Amber B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding findings of fact merely referencing the statutory elements to be inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Jazmine L.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-10-01· cited 32×
• Schwartz v. Unemployment Insurance Commission
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-04-26· cited 23×
• In Re David G.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-06-09· cited 21×
• In Re Heather G.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-09-12· cited 11×
• In Re Kenneth H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-03-18· cited 11×
• In Re Sara K.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-07-20· cited 9×
• In Re Peter M.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-02-11· cited 6×
• Ricci v. Delehanty
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-10-22· cited 5×
• In Re Dylan B.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-02-09· cited 5×
• In re Aubrey R.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2017-03-07· cited 4×
• In re Children of Billis S.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2024-01-09· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santosky v. Kramer
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
• In Re Amanda D.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-10-28· cited 10×