Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 4/14/2016

In re Ross

Citations

  • 548 B.R. 632
  • 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 1665
  • 62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 130
  • 2016 WL 1556002

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[A] debtor's lack of knowledge ... of a cause of action is irrelevant for the purpose of determining ownership in a bankruptcy proceeding.\
  • implanted medical device constituted an injury when, post-bankruptcy, it became a harm recognized by the medical community, and therefore failure- to-warn cause of action did not accrue pre-bankruptcy
  • “The Chapter 7 trustee, standing in the debtor’s shoes, can main-tain only those actions that the debtor could have brought prior to or when she filed her bankruptcy petition”
  • “complete and present action” existed not when the debtor knew she had a legally cognizable injury but when “the elements necessary to commence an action under state law” were “present”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grossman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.