Skip to main content
· 11/6/2006

Robert J. Musso v. Tanya Ostashko

Citations

  • 468 F.3d 99
  • 56 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1785
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27411
  • 2006 WL 3190285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[a] spouse without legal title has no interest in marital property prior to obtaining a judgment creating such an interest”
  • stating that “an equitable distribution award is similar to the imposition of a constructive trust”
  • stating that “entry of the judgment is critical, under New York law, to cementing the spouse’s interest in the property” in relation to another creditor
  • finding that at “no point prior to judgment does [DRL § 236] create any contingent or present vested interests, legal or equitable, by virtue of the parties’ marital status or prior to a judgment dissolving their union” (citation omitted)
  • “‘Docketing’ occurs when the judgment is recorded by the clerk in books listing the surnames of judgment debtors alphabetically.”
  • 11 U.S.C. § 544 gives bankruptcy trustee the rights of a hypothetical perfected judgment lien creditor as of date of bankruptcy petition and consent judgment was constructive fraudulent conveyance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Wesley, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.