Skip to main content
· 8/23/1994

In Re Bieganowski

Citations

  • 520 N.W.2d 525
  • 1994 Minn. App. LEXIS 849
  • 1994 WL 450456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court abused its discretion in allowing witness to testify by telephone in absence of rule or statute permitting such testimony as a “substitute for oral testimony in open court”
  • sexual predator’s failure to remove himself from situations that provide opportunity for similar offenses and failure to avoid precursors that trigger impulsive behavior, such as consumption of alcohol, demonstrate lack of control; court also cited expert testimony and lack of treatment
  • sexual predator's failure to remove himself from situations that provide opportunity for similar offenses and failure to avoid precursors that trigger impulsive behavior, such as consumption of alcohol, demonstrate lack of control; court also cited expert testimony and lack of treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crippen, Parker, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.