Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 3/12/2008
In Re Rodriguez
Citations
- 248 S.W.3d 444
- 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 1773
- 2008 WL 651593
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that party has no adequate remedy by appeal from trial court’s order in contravention of section 160.607 statute of limitations
- concluding that the Texas Legislature specifically limited paternity challenges “to protect the family unit” and thus, DNA evidence allegedly disproving a father-child relationship is not always admissible
- explaining difficult policy choices of limiting proceedings to disprove a presumed father’s relationship
- order requiring genetic testing in contravention of the time limitations for an adjudication of parentage set forth in section 160.607 constitutes an abuse of discretion
- addressing challenge to paternity of child born during marriage
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, O'Neill, Lang
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re the Office of the Attorney GeneralTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-01-16· cited 30×
- In the Interest of J.H.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2008-09-10· cited 14×
- In Re C.S., RelatorTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-01-09· cited 9×
- in the Interest of K.M.T., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2013-10-18· cited 8×
- D.E. v. K.F.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-12-18· cited 8×
- in Re S.T.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-12· cited 7×
- Lorena Quiroz v. Rummie Lee Gray, IITex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2014-04-25· cited 7×
- in Re Judith Shoemaker GibsonTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2017-10-24· cited 7×
- In Re Office of Attorney General of Tex.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2008-12-03· cited 6×
- State v. WolfgramNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-12-18· cited 1×
- Deboer v. DeboerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-10-24· cited 1×
- Gomez v. GomezTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-05-26· cited 1×
- In Re JHTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2008-09-10
- In Re CSTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-01-09
- in Re Kelsi M. BaggettTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2014-09-30
- in Re the Office of the Attorney General of TexasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-12-11
- Jesus Vela v. Yanira VelaTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-02-25
- Debra Lee Jones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-06-30
- Joshua Ludy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-01-04
- in Re: Stanley NgoTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2013-08-02
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court· 1992-05-07· cited 8,808×
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 4,288×
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court· 1985-12-11· cited 1,738×
- In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.Texas Supreme Court· 2005-05-13· cited 833×
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 719×
- Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1988-12-07· cited 563×
- In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2005-05-27· cited 361×
- In Re Texas Department of Family & Protective ServicesTexas Supreme Court· 2006-12-15· cited 230×
- Weaver v. WittTexas Supreme Court· 1977-11-16· cited 208×
- In Re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 194×
- In Re Dana Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 2004-06-11· cited 153×
- In Re Texas American Express, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2005-12-07· cited 52×
- Amanda v. MontgomeryTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-05-26· cited 50×
- In Re Attorney General of TexasTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2006-02-22· cited 22×
- In the Interest of S.C.L.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-10-31· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.