In Re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that parties are in danger of losing substantial rights when, among other things, their ability to present a viable claim or defense is vitiated
• stating that a party has no adequate appellate remedy by appeal from a final judgment if the appellate courts would not be able to cure the error on appeal
• describing an appellate remedy as inadequate when “parties are in danger of permanently losing substantial rights” and “the appellate court would not be able to cure the error”
• granting relief from order consolidating twenty mass tort cases against different defendants who manufactured different chemicals where former employees’ claims were totally unrelated and juror confusion could not be remedied on appeal
• “Absent extraordinary circumstances, mandamus will not issue unless defendants lack an adequate appellate remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).