In Re Arochem Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a bankruptcy court’s conclusions on a conflict of interest should be accorded deference
• observing that Congress intended only to proscribe those who presently have an adverse interest from representing a debtor under section 327(a)
• concluding that a bankruptcy judge “has at his disposal an armamentarium of permissible remedies, including ... disqualification [and] disal-lowance of all or some fees” if the judge were to later perceive a materially adverse interest on the part of special counsel
• explaining that a bankruptcy court exercises “discretionary powers” in evaluating the proposed retention of bankruptcy professionals under Section 327
• stating that a bankruptcy court’s conclusions on a conflict of interest should be accorded deference
• explaining that the “flexible” nature of bankruptcy finality does not “overcome the general aversion to piecemeal appeals” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).