Skip to main content
· 9/17/1985

In Re Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

Citations

  • 624 F. Supp. 1212
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The [drug] warnings [on labels] are out-of-court statements offered to prove the truth of the matters asserted. . . . The warnings are in fact inadmissible hearsay.”
  • “The [drug] warnings [on labels] are out-of-court statements offered to prove the truth of the matters asserted. . . . The warnings are in fact inadmissible hearsay.”
  • PDR did not fall within the commercial publications exception of Fed.R.Evid. 803(17)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carl B. Rubin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.