In Re REYNOLDS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney’s personal drug use did not violate DR 1-102(A)(5)
• concurring opinion of Farrell, J., joined by Terry, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Goldsborough
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-02-23· cited 269×
• In Re Hopkins
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-05-31· cited 40×
• In Re Dortch
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-10-21· cited 27×
• In Re White
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-20· cited 18×
• In Re Marshall
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-11-22· cited 15×
• In Re Mason
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-09-02· cited 12×
• In Re Reynolds
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-14· cited 6×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Zilberberg
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-04· cited 198×
• In Re Hutchinson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-12-04· cited 140×
• Matter of Shorter
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-21· cited 84×
• In Re Reback
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-01-31· cited 46×
• Matter of Keiler
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-10-17· cited 40×
• Matter of Burka
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-10-21· cited 30×
• In Re Lenoir
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-01-17· cited 23×
• In Re Robertson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-15· cited 13×
• In Re Delate
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-09-06· cited 13×
• Matter of Greenspan
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-07-27· cited 11×
• In Re Solomon
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-11-27· cited 9×
• In re Solerwitz
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-05-30· cited 9×