D. Massachusetts· 11/10/2003
In re Relafen Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 218 F.R.D. 337
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20306
- 2003 WL 22680883
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “forty individuals [are] generally found to establish numerosity”
- “forty individuals [are] generally found to establish numerosity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Salvas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-09-23· cited 67×
- In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2004-05-12· cited 61×
- Meijer, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Holdings Co. III, Ltd.District of Columbia· 2007-10-22· cited 38×
- In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2005-09-28· cited 37×
- Swack v. Credit Suisse First BostonD. Massachusetts· 2005-09-14· cited 35×
- Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. Warner Holdings Co. III, Ltd.District of Columbia· 2007-11-15· cited 30×
- Kenneth R. v. HassanD. New Hampshire· 2013-09-17· cited 30×
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCD. New Mexico· 2015-03-19· cited 28×
- In Re Cipro Cases I and IICalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-07-21· cited 26×
- Natchitoches Parish Hospital Service District v. Tyco International, Ltd.D. Massachusetts· 2008-01-29· cited 26×
- Bustillos v. Board of County CommissionersD. New Mexico· 2016-09-16· cited 26×
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2014-09-04· cited 23×
- McLaughlin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceD. Massachusetts· 2004-10-20· cited 23×
- In Re Relafen Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2004-11-29· cited 20×
- George v. National Water Main Cleaning Co.D. Massachusetts· 2012-09-27· cited 19×
- DeRosa v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY COMMUTER RAIL COMPANYD. Massachusetts· 2010-03-17· cited 18×
- Chemi SpA v. GlaxoSmithKlineE.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-02-08· cited 16×
- In re Hannaford Bros.D. Maine· 2013-03-20· cited 15×
- In re Dial Complete Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationD. New Hampshire· 2015-12-08· cited 14×
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2013-12-11· cited 13×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 921×
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyFifth Circuit· 1996-05-23· cited 871×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 2001-10-17· cited 451×
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayFirst Circuit· 2000-03-31· cited 347×
- Wanda Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1986-03-03· cited 312×
- Smilow v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.First Circuit· 2003-03-07· cited 300×
- Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp.First Circuit· 1985-12-19· cited 277×
- Guckenberger v. Boston UniversityD. Massachusetts· 1997-01-28· cited 112×
- In re Potash Antitrust LitigationD. Minnesota· 1995-01-12· cited 106×
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationE.D. Michigan· 2001-03-14· cited 80×
- Miller v. Mackey International, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1971-11-23· cited 78×
- Duhaime v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceD. Massachusetts· 1997-12-31· cited 43×
- In re Buspirone Patent LitigationS.D. New York· 2002-08-19· cited 30×
- McIntosh v. Irwin Union Bank & Trust, Co.D. Massachusetts· 2003-05-13· cited 23×
- In Re Relafen Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2003-10-01· cited 19×
- Rental Car of New Hampshire, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.D. Massachusetts· 1980-06-20· cited 15×
- In re Screws Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 1981-07-15· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.