D. Massachusetts· 11/29/2004

In Re Relafen Antitrust Litigation

Citations

346 F. Supp. 2d 349
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26996
2004 WL 2750101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that under patent law, “[p]laintiffs must establish the first, objective prong of the sham definition by clear and convincing evidence.”
finding that “‘the facts tending to establish the existence or want of existence of probable cause’ were disputed, rendering the question inappropriate for decision as matter of law”
rejecting argument that denial of summary judgment established probable cause to initiate civil case
the plaintiffs could seek damages for the full amount of the overcharge, despite the defendants’ evidence of generic bypass
“Here, ‘the facts tending to establish the existence or want of existence of probable cause’ were disputed, ren- dering the question inappropriate for decision as matter of law.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.