Fifth Circuit· 10/30/2009
In Re ProEducation Intern., Inc.
Citations
- 587 F.3d 296
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23906
- 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 79
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- AThe Fifth Circuit has recognized the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct . . . as the national standards to consider in reviewing motions to disqualify. Therefore, [in cases applying Texas law] we . . . consider both the Texas Rules and the Model Rules.@
- AThe Fifth Circuit has recognized the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct . . . as the national standards to consider in reviewing motions to disqualify. Therefore, [in cases applying Texas law] we . . . consider both the Texas Rules and the Model Rules.@
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Davis and Benavides, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jacobsen v. Moser (In Re Jacobsen)Fifth Circuit· 2010-06-16· cited 84×
- Carl Selenberg v. Dianne BatesFifth Circuit· 2017-05-08· cited 43×
- Sikes v. Crager (In Re Crager)Fifth Circuit· 2012-08-16· cited 34×
- In re BrownS.D. Texas· 2014-06-18· cited 12×
- Gordon Westergren & Mark Sparks v. Johnnie Glenn Jennings, Jr.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-06-12· cited 8×
- Esfeller v. O'KeefeFifth Circuit· 2010-08-03· cited 8×
- National Oilwell Varco, L.P. v. Omron Oilfield & Marine, Inc.W.D. Texas· 2014-11-14· cited 7×
- Ring Plus, Inc. v. Cingular Wireless Corp.Federal Circuit· 2010-08-06· cited 6×
- Holt Texas, Ltd. v. Zayler (In Re T.S.C. Seiber Services, L.C.)Fifth Circuit· 2014-11-03· cited 6×
- Academy of Allergy v. La. Health Serv. & Indem. Co.E.D. Louisiana· 2018-10-02· cited 6×
- Dynamic 3D Geosolutions LLC v. Schlumberger LimitedFederal Circuit· 2016-09-12· cited 4×
- Duke Investments, Ltd. v. Amegy Bank, N.A. (In Re Duke Investments, Ltd.)S.D. Texas· 2011-06-17· cited 2×
- D'Andrea v. Epstein, Becker, Green, Wickliff & Hall, P.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2013-12-12· cited 2×
- Stephen Montalto v. MS Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 2019-09-11· cited 1×
- Buchanan v. AlexanderM.D. Louisiana· 2018-01-10· cited 1×
- Jacobsen v. MoserFifth Circuit· 2010-07-12
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-12-12
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-10-31
- Charles Anthony Malouff, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-03-09
- In re WhitcombS.D. Texas· 2017-09-19
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
- In Re American Airlines, Inc., Amr CorporationFifth Circuit· 1992-09-29· cited 184×
- National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. GodbeyTexas Supreme Court· 1996-06-06· cited 172×
- American Can Company v. Citrus Feed Co.Fifth Circuit· 1971-03-04· cited 101×
- F.D.I.C. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co.Fifth Circuit· 1995-04-07· cited 95×
- Walker v. City of Mesquite TX.Fifth Circuit· 1997-12-10· cited 92×
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Kraft, Inc. v. Alton Box Board Co., and Container Corporation of AmericaFifth Circuit· 1981-10-29· cited 91×
- Dawson v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1995-10-31· cited 81×
- Henderson v. FloydTexas Supreme Court· 1995-02-16· cited 66×
- Matta v. MayFifth Circuit· 1997-07-31· cited 60×
- Church of Scientology of California, a Non-Profit Corporation, Under the Laws of California v. John McLean and Nancy McLeanFifth Circuit· 1980-04-18· cited 57×
- In Re Entringer Bakeries, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2008-11-06· cited 31×
- Jack Cole Company and Dixie Highway Express, Inc. v. Mrs. W. H. HudsonFifth Circuit· 1969-04-03· cited 28×
- In Re BascoTexas Supreme Court· 2007-04-20· cited 22×
- Clarke v. RuffinoCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-27· cited 21×
- In Re MitchamTexas Supreme Court· 2004-03-26· cited 12×
- Kennedy v. MindPrintFifth Circuit· 2009-11-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.