Skip to main content
· 3/26/2004

In Re Mitcham

Citations

  • 133 S.W.3d 274
  • 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 374
  • 2004 Tex. LEXIS 244
  • 2004 WL 692342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disqualifying attorney's new firm for violating confidentiality agreement, not on grounds of imputed knowledge
  • these measures include “prophylactic measures assuring that legal assistants do not work on matters related to their prior employment.”
  • “For attorneys, there is an irrebuttable presumption they gain confidential information on every case at the firm where they work (whether they work on them or not).”
  • where a new employer hired an attorney who had worked as a legal assistant on another law firm’s defense of asbestos claims against TXU, the new employer was disqualified from representing plaintiffs asserting asbestos suits against TXU

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.