Walker v. City of Mesquite TX.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court's finding that an attorney was guilty of \blatant misconduct\ was sufficient to show cognizable reputational injury
• holding that the trial court’s finding that the attorney was “guilty of blatant misconduct” constituted “a blot on [the attorney’s] professional record” and presented a reviewable appellate issue
• holding that a district court’s finding that an attorney was guilty of “blatant misconduct” was sufficient to show cognizable reputational injury
• holding that an attorney had a right to appeal where the district court sternly reprimanded him on the record and found him guilty of blatant misconduct
• holding that an attorney had a right to appeal where the district court sternly reprim anded him on the record and found him guilty of blatant m isconduct
• “We have heretofore held that monetary penalties or losses are not an essential for an appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).