In Re Potts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• revising bill upward in anticipation of litigation rather than in line with actual time spent violates DR 2-106(A)
• charging for firm’s time spent defending fee claim constitutes charging an excessive fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Gastineau
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-09-02· cited 23×
• In Re Whipple
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-12-29· cited 20×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Wyllie
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-02-23· cited 10×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paulson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-06-05· cited 8×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Benett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-11-09· cited 8×
• In re McGraw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-04-05· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Reuter
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-05-21· cited 90×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hiller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-01-22· cited 48×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Thomas
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-02-15· cited 29×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Vaile
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-10-01· cited 16×
• Heritage Enterprises v. City of Corvallis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-10-29· cited 11×
• Bohm v. Holzberg
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1972-01-21· cited 9×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Richards
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1954-10-06· cited 6×
• The Florida Bar v. Shannon
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-11-01· cited 6×
• In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Trammell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-29· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1978-07-19· cited 1×