Bohm v. Holzberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting equal division of fees despite 80%-20% actual division of work, under former Ethical Canon 34, see footnote 3, supra

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schniederjon v. Krupa
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-01-28· cited 26×
• Carter v. Katz, Shandell, Katz & Erasmous
  New York Supreme Court· 1983-07-29· cited 22×
• Breckler v. Thaler
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-12-11· cited 19×
• Rozales v. Pegalis & Wachsman, P. C.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-02-02· cited 8×
• A. Stanley Proner, P. C. v. Julien & Schlesinger, P. C.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-11-12· cited 8×
• In Re Potts
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-29· cited 6×
• Dragelevich v. Kohn, Milstein, Cohen & Hausfeld
  N.D. Ohio· 1990-11-28· cited 6×
• Baron & Vesel, P. C. v. Gammerman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-05-10· cited 2×
• In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Trammell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-29· cited 2×