Skip to main content
· 10/1/1985

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Vaile

Citations

  • 707 P.2d 52
  • 300 Or. 91
  • 1985 Ore. LEXIS 1563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that DR 1-103(C) requires response to Bar inquiries, in addition to cooperation with LPRC
  • illustrating proposition; In re Schaffner, 325 Or. 421, 425, 939 P.2d 39 (1997) (same
  • illustrating proposition; In re Schaffner, 325 Or 421, 425, 939 P2d 39 (1997) (same
  • presentation of evidence to LPRC does not obviate response to Disciplinary Counsel
  • presentation of evidence to LPRC does not obviate response to Disciplinary Counsel
  • suspended for 60 days and placed on probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.