In re: B.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing K.J.D. but distinguishing it in part because the trial court did not find a substantial risk of harm if B.P. were returned to her mother’s custody and such a finding could not be implied from the evidence
• discussing K.J.D. but distinguishing it in part because the trial court did not find a substantial risk of harm if B.P. were returned to her mother’s custody and such a finding could not be implied from the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: C.C.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-07-03· cited 2×
• In re: E.P-L.M.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-08-04
• In re: D.S.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-10-18
• In re: A.J., J.C.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2023-07-18
• In re: B.C. & I.C.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-03-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re PM
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-04-05· cited 123×
• In re T.H.T.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-08-21· cited 79×
• In Re JS
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2004-07-20· cited 66×
• In re J.W.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-10-04· cited 38×
• In re D.M.M.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2006-09-05· cited 27×
• In Re Kjd
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2010-05-04· cited 18×
• In re A.S.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-11-15· cited 3×