Sixth Circuit· 11/3/1986
In Re Phillips
Citations
- 804 F.2d 930
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a family relationship even supported a 23 finding of reasonable reliance, a more exacting standard than 24 justifiable reliance
- “in-ferr[ing] that the [debtors] knowingly made a materially false representation” where the debtors “admitted] that they knew the purpose of a mortgage deed and that they knew the deed description was inaccurate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 5,972×
- In Re Benethel Rembert, Debtor. Benethel Rembert v. At & T Universal Card Services, Inc. Citibank South Dakota, N.A.Sixth Circuit· 1998-05-29· cited 416×
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,430 in Re William J. McLaren Debtor. William Longo, Sr. v. William J. McLarenSixth Circuit· 1993-08-30· cited 221×
- In Re: James A. Brady, Debtor. James A. Brady v. Donald T. McAllisterSixth Circuit· 1997-02-21· cited 191×
- In Re Ronald Kirsh in Re Paula Kirsh, Debtors. Eugene Parks Law Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Ronald Kirsh Paula KirshNinth Circuit· 1992-08-31· cited 173×
- In Re Philip Rubin, Debtor. Philip Rubin v. Hugh E. West Yasue WestNinth Circuit· 1989-05-19· cited 112×
- Haney v. Copeland (In Re Copeland)E.D. Tennessee· 2003-03-10· cited 78×
- First American Bank of New York v. Bodenstein (In Re Bodenstein)E.D. New York· 1994-06-14· cited 71×
- Smith v. Meyers (In Re Schwartz & Meyers)S.D. New York· 1991-08-07· cited 48×
- In RE McLARENSixth Circuit· 1993-04-07· cited 42×
- Charell v. Gonzalez (In Re Gonzalez)S.D. New York· 1999-11-18· cited 31×
- In Re BulsonW.D. Michigan· 2005-05-27· cited 26×
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Calhoun (In Re Calhoun)District of Columbia· 1991-11-25· cited 23×
- At & T Universal Card Services Corp. v. Akdogan (In Re Akdogan)E.D. New York· 1997-01-15· cited 22×
- Cooke v. Howarter (In Re Howarter)Ninth Circuit· 1990-05-18· cited 21×
- Trump Plaza Associates v. Poskanzer (In Re Poskanzer)D. New Jersey· 1992-05-28· cited 19×
- Longo v. McLaren (In Re McLaren)N.D. Ohio· 1992-01-24· cited 18×
- Fluehr v. Paolino (In Re Paolino)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-08-05· cited 17×
- Rally Hill Productions, Inc. v. Bursack (In Re Bursack)M.D. Tennessee· 1994-01-31· cited 17×
- Meggs v. Booth (In Re Booth)N.D. Alabama· 1994-12-01· cited 16×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1878-02-18· cited 399×
- In the Matter of Ben F. Garman, Bankrupt. The Northern Trust Company v. Ben F. GarmanSeventh Circuit· 1980-06-23· cited 183×
- In Re Giuseppe Matera, Bankrupt. Peter Carini v. Giuseppe MateraSeventh Circuit· 1979-02-13· cited 141×
- National Bank of North America v. Newmark (In Re Newmark)E.D. New York· 1982-06-01· cited 103×
- Minority Equity Capital Corp. v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)E.D. New York· 1983-07-13· cited 84×
- Knoxville Teachers Credit Union v. Sylvia Rochelle ParkeySixth Circuit· 1986-05-12· cited 58×
- McMillan v. Firestone (In Re Firestone)S.D. Florida· 1982-08-18· cited 49×
- Montalvo v. Florence N. Sobel, Inc. (In Re Florence N. Sobel, Inc.)E.D. New York· 1984-02-16· cited 33×
- Mechanics & Farmers Savings Bank v. Fosco (In Re Fosco)D. Connecticut· 1981-10-30· cited 30×
- First National Bank of Cincinnati v. Hagedorn (In Re Hagedorn)S.D. Ohio· 1982-12-21· cited 26×
- Mick v. Hosking (In Re Hosking)W.D. Wisconsin· 1982-04-30· cited 14×
- U.S. Life Title Insurance Co. of Dallas v. Kisich (In Re Kisich)Ninth Circuit· 1983-03-15· cited 12×
- Phillips v. PhillipsSixth Circuit· 1986-11-03· cited 10×
- Amoco Oil Co. v. Misjak (In Re Misjak)W.D. Wisconsin· 1983-01-27· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.