Skip to main content
W.D. Tennessee· 5/8/1998

In Re Phillips

Citations

  • 219 B.R. 1001
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 561
  • 1998 WL 234578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disapproving practice of debtor’s attorney filing post-petition claims under § 1305 for routine prepetition attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses
  • finding, based on the legislative history and the interpretation of courts which have dealt with the issue, that routine legal work by a debtor’s attorney is not within the purview of § 1305(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William H. Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.