Charles W. GRANT, Ronald Bergwerk, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GEORGE SCHUMANN TIRE & BATTERY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even “exceptional” results do not warrant enhancement without specific evidence that quality of representation was superior to what would be expected in light of the rates paid
• interpreting pre-1994 § 330 as requiring that attorney’s appeal bring a benefit to the estate
• interpreting pre-1994 § 330 as requiring that attorney’s appeal bring a benefit to the estate
• requiring bankruptcy courts to utilize the lodestar method when determining reasonable compensation under § 330
• applying the lodestar method in determining a reasonable fee award in a bankruptcy case
• applying the lodestar approach to an analogous provision of the Bankruptcy Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).